Comments for Law on Rice http://blog.michaelrice.com This blog shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every case and proceeding Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:32:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1002, “Commencement of a Case” by Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004, “Examination” http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/03/federal-rule-of-bankruptcy-procedure-1002-commencement-of-a-case/comment-page-1/#comment-319 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004, “Examination” Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:32:09 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=919#comment-319 [...] Law on Rice This blog shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every case and proceeding « Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1002, “Commencement of a Case” [...] [...] Law on Rice This blog shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every case and proceeding « Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1002, “Commencement of a Case” [...]

]]> Comment on Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1001 by Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004, “Examination” http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/03/federal-rule-of-bankruptcy-procedure-1001/comment-page-1/#comment-318 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004, “Examination” Sat, 13 Mar 2010 05:29:52 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=885#comment-318 [...] jumping a little out of sequence on my review (see Rule 1001 and Rule 1002) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure because I was working with Rule 2004 [...] [...] jumping a little out of sequence on my review (see Rule 1001 and Rule 1002) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure because I was working with Rule 2004 [...]

]]> Comment on Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1001 by Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1002, “Commencement of a Case” http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/03/federal-rule-of-bankruptcy-procedure-1001/comment-page-1/#comment-314 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1002, “Commencement of a Case” Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:38:00 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=885#comment-314 [...] continuing my review of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, so the next one up is Rule 1002.  It appears [...] [...] continuing my review of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, so the next one up is Rule 1002.  It appears [...]

]]> Comment on Early reactions to Milavetz around the blogosphere by Bill McLeod http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/03/bog-reactions-milavetz/comment-page-1/#comment-307 Bill McLeod Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:38:07 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=909#comment-307 Michael, We are busy - but I expect a few more comments on the blog before the weekend. Thanks for visiting us! -Bill McLeod Michael,

We are busy – but I expect a few more comments on the blog before the weekend. Thanks for visiting us!

-Bill McLeod

]]> Comment on Bar exam, day one, first impressions by michael http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/02/bar-exam-day-one-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-261 michael Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:53:05 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=872#comment-261 ...and I'm on my third venti Americano of the day! …and I’m on my third venti Americano of the day!

]]> Comment on The Palm Tree Rule by Law on Rice » Blog Archive » The Flock Doctrine http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/02/the-palm-tree-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-231 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » The Flock Doctrine Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:10:23 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=808#comment-231 [...] long as I’m making rules for living, I might as well make another one.  In contrast to the Palm Tree Rule, the Flock Doctrine is a [...] [...] long as I’m making rules for living, I might as well make another one.  In contrast to the Palm Tree Rule, the Flock Doctrine is a [...]

]]> Comment on This is not embezzlement by Law on Rice » Blog Archive » This is not burglary http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/02/this-is-not-embezzlement/comment-page-1/#comment-225 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » This is not burglary Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:14:56 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=814#comment-225 [...] Law on Rice Procedure matters « This is not embezzlement [...] [...] Law on Rice Procedure matters « This is not embezzlement [...]

]]> Comment on The Palm Tree Rule by Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Taking the bar in Arizona was probably a mistake… http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/02/the-palm-tree-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-224 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Taking the bar in Arizona was probably a mistake… Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:19:49 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=808#comment-224 [...] Law on Rice Procedure matters « The Palm Tree Rule [...] [...] Law on Rice Procedure matters « The Palm Tree Rule [...]

]]> Comment on Donna Brazile coming to Seattle University by Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Twitter Updates for 2010-01-12 http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/01/donna-brazile-coming-to-seattle-university/comment-page-1/#comment-179 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Twitter Updates for 2010-01-12 Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:03:47 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=723#comment-179 [...] blog post: Donna Brazile coming to Seattle University http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/01/donna-brazile-coming-to-seattle-university/ [...] [...] blog post: Donna Brazile coming to Seattle University http://blog.michaelrice.com/2010/01/donna-brazile-coming-to-seattle-university/ [...]

]]> Comment on Bankruptcy Code perversions? by michael http://blog.michaelrice.com/2009/11/bankruptcy-code-perversions/comment-page-1/#comment-81 michael Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:02:54 +0000 http://blog.michaelrice.com/?p=582#comment-81 As I think about this, I think it might be a really interesting way to tweak the Bankruptcy Code. If allowed the Code to say, cram down the secured creditor's interest (esp. with regard to home mortgages), even 10%, then the creditors might be more tightly focused on who they are lending money to. That might be very productive indeed. As I think about this, I think it might be a really interesting way to tweak the Bankruptcy Code. If allowed the Code to say, cram down the secured creditor’s interest (esp. with regard to home mortgages), even 10%, then the creditors might be more tightly focused on who they are lending money to.

That might be very productive indeed.

]]>